// digital procurement team

Every buyer gets a digital team behind them.

Agents quote, negotiate and place orders inside your ERP. The buyer stays in command: deciding what matters and approving by exception. You compare it with what you already spend on people and BPO, by cost per transaction.

Trusted by global operations

// where money is left on the table

The opportunity lives in the small-ticket tail.

Up to 80% of your suppliers sit in small orders that add up to about 20% of spend. Quoting a small item takes as long as quoting a big one, so the whole tail goes unnegotiated, order after order.

It is not a team failure. It is capacity arithmetic: people don't scale at the speed of volume. Your purchasing volume grows; your team doesn't need to grow with it.

We are the team that quotes. Agents work the tail order by order, and the buyer moves from the quoting queue to command: exceptions, strategic suppliers and whatever takes judgment.

Total processed
everything that flows through the ERP
Under contract
price already negotiated, nothing to dispute
Negotiable spot: the tail
where money is left on the table today

Illustrative proportions. The diagnostic measures your tail on your own data.

What stays human
Judgment and exceptionsStrategic negotiationSupplier relationships
// what we deliver: capacity

R$ 22 million processed through the tail, where nobody negotiated. R$ 1.6 million back.

R$ 22 million
processed through the tail
R$ 1.6 million
back to cash
zero
new hires

No new hires. Buyers moved from the quoting queue to strategic work, and the operation keeps running, order by order, every day. An industrial multinational, a real digital-team operation.

// two ways the math works

Created value on one side, lower cost on the other.

Where nobody negotiates

We create value that did not exist.

The long tail of orders that never fits anyone's calendar gets worked order by order. It is the money your operation leaves on the table, captured where there used to be only approval.

Where a team or BPO already works

We deliver the same work for less.

The same transactional volume runs at a lower cost per transaction, with SLAs open in a live cockpit. Your team stops growing with volume and keeps the work that needs judgment. And the contract shrinks with every cycle as agents absorb the routine, the opposite of BPO that grows with volume.

// start with the number

How much is sitting in your procurement tail?

Adjust the assumptions with the figures you already know from your spend. The result is the target the diagnostic will confirm on your own data.

R$ 300.000.000
15%

Se não souber, comece com 15%.

45%

Na base que analisamos, cerca de 45% da cauda estava em contrato.

4.6%

Taxa observada no nosso estudo na cauda (faixa 3% a 8%).

Potencial na mesa
R$ 1.138.500 / ano
Cauda fora de contrato considerada: R$ 24.750.000 / ano.
Não fazer nada
R$ 0
captura por ano

Todo o potencial fica na mesa, ano após ano.

Colocar mais gente
R$ 455.400
captura por ano

Pessoas não dão conta de cotar item miúdo em escala, e ainda somam custo de headcount.

40% é premissa ilustrativa.
Time digital da UpFlux
R$ 967.725
captura por ano

O Agente Negociador cobre a cauda inteira, autônomo, sem aumentar o time.

85% é premissa ilustrativa.
Ver o Agente Negociador

A taxa de saving e o split contrato/spot vêm do estudo real da UpFlux. As porcentagens de captura por cenário (0%, 40%, 85%) são premissas ilustrativas para comparação, ajuste conforme sua realidade. Não é uma promessa de resultado.

Base analisada pela UpFlux: ~R$ 59 bi em compras, ~3 milhões de itens de pedido.
// how it enters your operation

Pick the size of the step that fits now.

International recognition, the only Latin American vendor
GartnerEverest Group PEAK MatrixISGNelsonHall